Is Dark Energy Getting Stronger?

  • Ajoutée Il y a 2 mois

    PBS Space TimePBS Space Time

    Durée: 18:22

    Learn More about The Great Courses Plus: ow.ly/wvWC30o0QYV
    Check out the new Space Time Merch Store!
    pbsspacetime.com/
    Support Space Time on Patreon
    www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime
    The power of Dark Energy may be increasing as the universe ages. Subtle clues are emerging that the accepted model for the nature of dark energy and dark matter may not be all that. We saw the first such clue recently in our recent episode on the Crisis in Cosmology. Today we’re doing a Space Time Journal Club to reveal another clue. We’re looking at a new paper in Nature Astronomy, “Cosmological constraints from the Hubble diagram of quasars at high redshifts” by Risaliti and Lusso. It hints that the cosmological constant may not be so constant after all. In fact it may be increasing. If this is true, then our prediction for the future of our universe looks VERY different, and may involve the entire universe tearing itself to shreds at the subatomic level in the Big Rip.
    On this edition of Space Time Journal Club we look at:
    Risaliti & Lusso (2019) "Cosmological Constraints from the Hubble Diagram of Quasars at High Redshifts"
    www.nature.com/articles/s41550-018-0657-z
    #darkenergy #darkmatter #spacetime
    More about The Great Courses Plus:
    The Great Courses Plus is currently available to watch through a web browser to almost anyone in the world and optimized for the US, UK, and Australian markets. The Great Courses Plus is currently working to both optimize the product globally and accept credit card payments globally.
    Learn More About Dark Energy Here:
    fr-film.net/play/PLsPUh22kYmNA6WUmOsEEi32zi_RdSUF4i
    Hosted by Matt O'Dowd
    Written by Matt O'Dowd
    Graphics by Aaron Halevy
    Directing by Andrew Kornhaber
    Special thanks to our Patreon Big Bang, Quasar and Hypernova Supporters:
    Big Bang:
    Anton Lifshits
    coolascats
    David Nicklas
    Fabrice Eap
    Juan Benet
    Justin Lloyd
    Tim Davis
    Quasar:
    James Flowers
    Mark Rosenthal
    Tambe Barsbay
    Vinnie Falco
    Hypernova:
    chuck zegar
    Danton Spivey
    Donal Botkin
    Edmund Fokschaner
    Jens Theisen
    John Hofmann
    Jordan Young
    Joseph Salomone
    kkm
    Mark Heising
    Matthew O'Connor
    Thanks to our Patreon Gamma Ray Burst Supporters:
    Alexey Eromenko
    Antonio Ruiz
    Bradley Jenkins
    Brandon Labonte
    Buruk Aregawi
    Carlo Mogavero
    Daniel Lyons
    David Behtala
    David Crane
    David Schmidt
    Dustan Jones
    Geoffrey Short
    Greg Weiss
    Jack Frosch
    James Hughes
    James Quintero
    Jinal Doshi
    JJ Bagnell
    John Webber
    Jon Folks
    Jonah
    Joseph Emison
    Josh Thomas
    Kenneth F Leonard
    Kevin Warne
    Kyle Hofer
    Malte Ubl
    Mark Vasile
    Nathan Hitchings
    Nicholas Rose
    Nick Virtue
    Ratfeast
    Richard Broman
    Scott Gossett
    Sigurd Ruud Frivik
    Tim Crookham
    Tim Stephani
    Tommy Mogensen
    سلطان الخليفي

    Space  Outer Space  Physics  Astrophysics  Quantum Mechanics  Space Physics  PBS  Space Time  Time  PBS Space Time  Matt O’Dowd  Astrobiology  Einstein  Einsteinian Physics  General Relativity  Special Relativity  Dark Energy  Dark Matter  Black Holes  The Universe  

Mr Mellon
Mr Mellon

I wonder if space isn't expanding, but "falling" outwards. Local gravity may have slowed the falling rate early but just like gravity from matter, spacetime is falling like the center of gravity is just outward. I wonder if that could be calculated

Il y a jour
mastrtonberry2
mastrtonberry2

I like all the Star Trek SFX

Il y a 5 jours
David Fuller
David Fuller

Shamanistic Witch Doctor of Physics Jargon

Il y a 11 jours
Accutronitis The 2nd
Accutronitis The 2nd

This channel never fails to expand my knowledge of our universe!

Il y a 15 jours
Matt Woodruff
Matt Woodruff

You guys have great content but a terrible intro song. You need something more pumped up and melodic.

Il y a 17 jours
ijams sum
ijams sum

They make incorrect assumptions looking back thru time 14-15 billion years ago matter and the laws of physics operated the same as now with no dilation ? Looking back at the early universe it should be expanding fast from the big bang and slowed down later by gravitational forces of mass when gravity was established ! There is no dark matter energy only the universe before physical laws were fully established and what they see happening back then is not the laws today,  change set in over some time ! The early universe had little matter to absorb the great energy from the beginning , later the mass assumed physical laws of attraction and absorbed the energy to slow down the Galaxies enough to be stable ! What they are seeing is not even happening today , its 15 billion years ago ! No intuition in science is used only cold incorrect math lacking all the laws of the universe ! Only some laws are known , we are infants at cosmology as intuition has been left behind and no insight is used in science academia in cosmology today and they are more lost than they ever hoped to be lol ! Corona Fusion is the correct theory of our Sun not core fusion and the data is right in front of them but they are blinded by a failed theory to protect science academia from being very wrong from the start ? Cosmology is a farce in many areas and it takes genius to invent a invisible energy dark matter to explain away there failings because you cannot disprove the invisible ! See how science academia works , so now they say it takes 40,000 years for photons at our Suns core to reach the surface of the Sun to explain away the very low  surface temperature on the Sun ???? Genius to invent a theory to protect your failed theory so the public cannot see the mistaken theories in our textbooks ? Once you wake up and see the truth you see how little we know and how what has been portrayed as fact is false science and still in textbooks ! No morals allowed because science must be protected from itself by inventing theories that cannot be disproved ! Dark Matter is just such a invention , because they are lost without a clue of intuition ? Dimensional travel and traveling past the speed of light is possible , but you must create a field around a craft the blocks subatomic entanglement that lets the craft have zero mass in our space dimension and blocking our physical laws is all it takes but few people can even think this is possible ? Once you see a UFO your mind opens up very much , and the reality sets in we are to be deceived completely from the truth as science has zero morals !

Il y a 18 jours
Chad Davis
Chad Davis

I think that there could be a possible error in the interpretation of the redshift increase from the quasar measurement, the dark energy being observed getting stronger around using these quasars could be the black hole expanding space by condensing energy to negative energy. There must be a way to measure this dark energy increase in relation to a few relative nearby black holes to one another and the red shift observed between there varying masses and amount of matter being consumed via the size of its accretion disc, assuming that something will be observed by this would give us an approximation of how much new space/dark energy is being created from the amount energy being converted in s black hole

Il y a 19 jours
Nicholas Pdx
Nicholas Pdx

How are you accessing my phone? I see you too..

Il y a 19 jours
TGK_Llama YT
TGK_Llama YT

This is the time that we need Thanos to get on the good sid

Il y a 19 jours
Trev Ashton
Trev Ashton

Out of curiosity, Has dark matter been found in galaxies that DONT have super massive black holes?

Il y a 20 jours
Philip Moran
Philip Moran

Gravity can be explained if everything expanded by 1/1000th per second!

Il y a 21 jour
Kane Morison
Kane Morison

Dark Energy maybe from the collapse of the first big 3 stars into black holes theses black holes having eaten all the local matter around. Collapse explode fragment into pockets of collapsing Matter Dark Energy just a guess way off

Il y a 25 jours
vivalafiaga
vivalafiaga

What if the entire universe is simply descending into an unimaginably huge black hole?

Il y a 27 jours
Bangla Desh
Bangla Desh

"Dark energy" is just the positive curvature of spacetime in the absence of mass on large scales directly proportionate to the density of mass on galactic scales. It's kind of counter intuitive but I've done all the calculations and wrote 2 papers on it, but 6 journals have refused to publish my work as they're invested in other theories. True story.

Il y a mois
Matlockization
Matlockization

Dark energy is not getting stronger but darker !

Il y a mois
Derrick Bommarito
Derrick Bommarito

What would the universe look like (besides very dark) to the last remaining animals when a big rip changes the universe enough to become observable? What new chemistry might result that becomes dominant over what I would expect to be a very long period of slow atomic tearing? Does the big rip result in everything inevitably turning itself into WonkaVision static?

Il y a mois
Brett Augustine
Brett Augustine

Is that a cockmonaut on your shirt?

Il y a mois
GIJosh
GIJosh

Next April 1st, they need to make a video that asks a question, and answers with "yes" or "no", then end the video.

Il y a mois
Waizwaid Arenosa
Waizwaid Arenosa

I love this guy; I don't believe he is human; he is too advanced. Nevertheless, I love him. I can listen to him forever.

Il y a mois
Cerberus
Cerberus

I think Entropy is definitely getting stronger.

Il y a mois
Arun Sasi
Arun Sasi

Very hypothetical question! Assuming lambda is not uniform across space, will relative expansion of space have relativistic effects on each other?

Il y a mois
Harry ToyShirt
Harry ToyShirt

So much for "dahk" energy. Someone send a boatload of R's to the Brits.

Il y a mois
nope sorry
nope sorry

spacetime tearing itself to shreds on the subatomic level... well that certainly would be a big R.I.P

Il y a mois
Gabrielle Grandcamp
Gabrielle Grandcamp

WHAT IF there was no dark energy at all, like the gravitation isn't a force but more like a propriety of the structure of the space time universe, I'm wondering, what if what we call dark energy is in fact the response of the space time fabric to gravity, like if I put a finger on a baloon, if i press hard, outside this zone of the pressure caused by my finger, the balloon is expanding, so maybe, the expansion is accelerating because there are nothing to stop this expansion, unlike the balloon. So the filaments of galaxies is in fact valleys in a 3d space, caused by the mass of the galaxies themselves, galaxies "squeezed" by monts of void (or less dense universe) created in consequence of their mass pushing on the space time fabric, like fingers on a balloon ? (sorry I'm french, I hope I'm a bit comprehensible) and it's like an answer of the period the universe didn't expand, the space was not enough big to permit the creation of valleys caused by gravity and maybe, maybe, the acceleration of the expansion is caused by what black holes do in the space time fabric, an expansion fuelled by the infinite mass in the center of the black holes ?

Il y a mois
Dom Trussardi
Dom Trussardi

If there was a "NIgga...the hell you talkin bout?" meme, this guy would show up in half of them.

Il y a mois
Jordan Bayless
Jordan Bayless

WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!

Il y a mois
ALT SOLUTIONS LIMITED
ALT SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Any energy has quantitative and qualitative characteristics. Stronger or weaker is just the degree of impact in a certain place on a certain object. It is more reasonable to talk about the quality of energy and its use in real life. Accordingly, management of this energy.

Il y a mois
ofsinope
ofsinope

That moment when he says "spacetime" at the end

Il y a mois
Jesse Mai
Jesse Mai

show me the math, intuitively I disagree on both experimental and theoretical platforms... show me the math for corrected theoretical measurements and the math for the theory behind it

Il y a mois
Sandy
Sandy

i feel intelligent after clicking this video...even though I don't understand what he says

Il y a mois
Jay Antani
Jay Antani

Cool Video!

Il y a mois
James Alexander
James Alexander

maybe the entropy of the universe is increasing which would explain it's expansion just like a piece of metal or being that this may only be a short period of rapid expansion; somewhat like an oven that may sit at say 350F for several seconds or more before actually reaching the next digit in temperature. Of course in reality, this may be a period of chaos, destruction & growth in the universe. People often misinterpret current events because they perceive reality to be steady without considering acceleration/deceleration

Il y a mois
Ne, oder?
Ne, oder?

12:33 says all about spacetime

Il y a mois
Sami Saieed
Sami Saieed

Totally, An epic episode

Il y a 2 mois
John Foyer
John Foyer

So this is the cosmic error He spoke of. Hm...well let's say I had a...conversation with a...deity that claimed he was the...creator. he spoke of this miscalculation that was originating from the effects black holes were having on the space time weave of the fabrics within the universe. The miscalculation was the gravitational effect of the first moments when particles first formed. The excess build up of particle formation led to the formation of black holes and the model of creation was a constant spherical shape that would expand and then retract. However o proposed a new algorithm to the model that would redistribute the excess particle energy to instead imbed themselves into the cosmic microwave background and using the energy generated by the particles and motion into and along the CMB to fill in the inconsistencies due to gravitational effects, then using the energy remainder to interweave itself with the fabric of particles stretching the borders of the universe infinitely outward, reinforcing the newly formed particles and allowing them to settle into the formation of matter without the gravitational build up the less to black hole formation. It was about thay time I woke up spitting up the lung fluid that had built up in my lungs while I was sleeping that night...

Il y a 2 mois
Luke Tyas
Luke Tyas

E Lusso is my next door neighbour, and one of the most wonderful humans in the Universe.

Il y a 2 mois
Walt F.
Walt F.

Could dark energy have a waveform? Could the expansion of space come in waves? An unaccelerated phase followed by an accelerated phase, followed again by an unaccelerated phase, and so on ad infinitum?

Il y a 2 mois
SketchyJay o.o
SketchyJay o.o

Could dark energy be caused by a layer of matter/charge which surrounds the universe. During the big bang this "shell" would have been expanded, possibly increasing the "space" between it and all other matter within the universe - reducing interactive forces. This could initially slow the expansion of the universe, however it's ability to expand without fracture could suggest 'elasticity' and would therefore recoil. Eventually this recoil would provide an inward pressure, while increasing the strength of interactive forces - increasing its pull on everything internal. This could therefore create the "illusion" that the expansion is accelerating when in actual fact space is in recession.

Il y a 2 mois
kaczan3
kaczan3

I love the music during the 14:41 anyone got a link for that?

Il y a 2 mois
Blair Macdonald
Blair Macdonald

10:00

Il y a 2 mois
Mr Temporal
Mr Temporal

Nice thumbnail

Il y a 2 mois
Kickin Rocks
Kickin Rocks

Starting a band... Tommy Terror and the Big Rip Quantum Physic and the Maths Bonaparte and the Big Bang White Hole and the Dark Matter Particle and the Waves Entry Lovell and the 101's Tyson Swarm and the Suns 10 Billion Days to Die The Eight Planets Celestial Hot Bodies When Iron Collides Lifeless XO's

Il y a 2 mois
Gsup7s
Gsup7s

Of course it's getting stronger. It's an unlimited free energy source. According to you.

Il y a 2 mois
Two super gamer girls
Two super gamer girls

You know I don't really understand because I'm only 8 years old.

Il y a 2 mois
JorDef
JorDef

I´m dumb, the earth is flat, there´s no cosmos there´s only god. We´re the center of all. No Jesus in this video. Because of all that I´m giving this video a dislike. Better go to church and spend money on crucifixes. You all will burn in hell!

Il y a 2 mois
FalconPunch827
FalconPunch827

Dark energy is a perfect metaphor for my father. Permeates through all existence but no one has a clue where it is.

Il y a 2 mois
Sledcat
Sledcat

Supernov eh!

Il y a 2 mois
nolan412
nolan412

Big phase change?

Il y a 2 mois
Chris Ritchie
Chris Ritchie

I discovered The Big Rip in my pants

Il y a 2 mois
Mike Price
Mike Price

I think part of the problem is we are using Euclid's yardstick instead of Mandelbrot yardstick

Il y a 2 mois
Gold161803
Gold161803

Take a shot every time the CMB graphic shows up in a Spacetime video

Il y a 2 mois
Deep Recce
Deep Recce

Question..How do we know the Universe expansion is not slowing down? We know its accelerating only because the further we see the greater the red shift right? But how does it measure up over time, as in maybe in a 1000 years time we see minute change in the expansion vs the current measurement? Also the further we see, meant that we are looking nearer to the beginning of the Universe where acceleration and expansion is greater nearer to the Big Bang..isnt it only natural to read a greater red shift as we see further away or rather further back in time??

Il y a 2 mois
GateMessenger
GateMessenger

The theory is a quasar is a black hole consuming matter at a continuous rate but that is not so. Quasars are actually old galaxies which contain a large amount of stars, plentiful and extremely close together. The older the galaxy is the brighter it shines. Black holes cannot devour matter because of the action that is causing gravity, mentioned in a previous comment. There was no big bang but a slow continuous growth. There is more gravity, matter, energy and space in the universe today than there was yesterday. There is more now than there was in the beginning when the universe did not contain gravity, matter, energy and space. Back then the universe only contained potential gravity, energy, matter and space in time.

Il y a 2 mois
GateMessenger
GateMessenger

The cosmic microwave background radiation map is the result of a manipulation in data, thus unreliable for any study.

Il y a 2 mois
GateMessenger
GateMessenger

No, a big rip will never happen because as new matter is made in space, see pair production and virtual particle theories, space increases in volume (dark energy). It is not being torn apart but increasing in volume like a balloon being filled with air. New particles are made when energy comes to a rest, i.e., m=E/c^2. This is why virtual particles appear to pop into existence in the sun's corona. See the newest ring discovered by astrophysicists orbiting Saturn. When new particle pop into existence in the sun's corona they make light, heat and pairs of particles (plasma). It explains why the sun's corona is millions of degrees hotter than it's surface. This is why stars grow in mass and size over time. Stars cannot 'burn up' over time because mass is constantly added to them. Yes, I know this is conjecture for now. Let's wait and see what the Parker probe discovers.

Il y a 2 mois
GateMessenger
GateMessenger

The lambda CDM 'cold dark matter' model is incorrect and incomplete. The cosmological constant was zero, not accelerating nor decelerating, i.e., a plus one or negative one thus it does not describe the expansion of the universe. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to go back to school and study it some more.

Il y a 2 mois
GateMessenger
GateMessenger

To answer your question, yes. The energy potential of the universe increases ever so slowly everywhere there is mass. See mass, in order to produce gravity has to have an equal opposite counterpart. When energy is produced inside of mass it escapes, quantum tunneling through matter, and produces a reaction to cold space, causing it to warp or bend, i.e., move in an opposite direction to the energy escaping mass. This was actually measured by the GRACE satellites. Gravity is stronger in the locations where energy is escaping the planet the most and gravity is weaker in the areas where energy escaping the surface is hindered by denser mass. Thus the same action responsible for gravity is also responsible for the expansion or addition of energy that occurs to space, i.e., dark energy. So yes, as long as mass is able to produce gravity it will continue to add new energy (dark) to space. This is why the Hubble constant, Ho is never the same when measured. Astrophysicists continue to come up with different rates to the universe's expansion with every measurement. This can even explain why stars move faster than what Einstein's field equations predicted, i.e., dark matter.

Il y a 2 mois
Bradley Carter
Bradley Carter

If all galaxies emit light and electromagnetic radiation in all directions simultaneously all the time, wouldn't the fields from the surrounding galaxies eventually meet and cause some sort or reflection thus pushing the galaxies further apart and explain dark energy?

Il y a 2 mois
POSH MARK
POSH MARK

I hope not!

Il y a 2 mois
Derek Currie
Derek Currie

*_"light_*_ noun_ *_1_*_ the natural agent that stimulates sight and makes things _*_visible:_*_ the light of the sun | [in singular] : the lamps in the street shed a faint light into the room._

Il y a 2 mois
Marcin Skrobański
Marcin Skrobański

have you ever tried gluon-free diet?

Il y a 2 mois
Ryan Flores
Ryan Flores

I have been talking and hearing a lot about the correlation of this and tachyon particles. Supposedly faster than the speed of light. Any potential videos on this?

Il y a 2 mois
Aby
Aby

hello....you havent considered that ark energy travels at least twice as fast as light can?! and that light speed depends on dark energy speed....not ot mention that thos light partciles that ae at teh edge of he big bang hypothesys need space to travel in for them to move out, menaing that dark matte rmust preceed light in its journey and create space time

Il y a 2 mois
Hydra
Hydra

My fucking brain

Il y a 2 mois
Zbigniew Modrzejewski
Zbigniew Modrzejewski

Dark Energy canNOT be Getting Stronger, because it does not exist.

Il y a 2 mois
Morbid Angel
Morbid Angel

Love the channel , love the science , still have no idea what dark energy is... hate my life....

Il y a 2 mois
Jeremy Castle
Jeremy Castle

Pieter van Dokkum (Yale University) allegedly discovered galaxies completely or nearly devoid of dark matter.

Il y a 2 mois
Abraham Mekonnen
Abraham Mekonnen

Out of curiosity is there any chance that dark energy is just space itself?

Il y a 2 mois
Vesa Kankkunen
Vesa Kankkunen

What if theres a huge black hole all ower the known universum acting like event horizont and phantom energy?

Il y a 2 mois
Narendra kumar
Narendra kumar

Sir please give a video for quantum spin....

Il y a 2 mois
Schlomo Finkelstein
Schlomo Finkelstein

13:56 xD

Il y a 2 mois
Korhanne
Korhanne

does my accretion disk make my butt look big?

Il y a 2 mois
Ibnul Hussaini
Ibnul Hussaini

That's fucken lit my dude! What's the value of the Hubble constant using this method vs the other standard candles & the CMB?

Il y a 2 mois
mR iOuS
mR iOuS

If the CMB gets shorter under the Rip Theory, the distance, just feels like to me, should have constant fluctuation.

Il y a 2 mois
ChrisBrengel
ChrisBrengel

So quasars are a hot mess...literally. LOL!

Il y a 2 mois
Bruce Liu
Bruce Liu

The rate of exploding stars? Might be dark energy.

Il y a 2 mois
Marvels Engineer
Marvels Engineer

Dark energy could be hidden energy which is multiplying constantly

Il y a 2 mois
Dudealus
Dudealus

After the Big Rip, would particles still be able to interact with the Higgs Field? Or would they all become massless, experience no internal evolution, and never bump into another particle, making the events before the Big Rip the last events ever to happen. Time would cease to exist.

Il y a 2 mois
Guillaume P
Guillaume P

Hey! Why don't you do a video on the recent discovery of CP Violation in the charm sector by the LHCb Experiment?

Il y a 2 mois
Dimitrios Thanos
Dimitrios Thanos

https://gleam.io/WK8YD-NKEWg2pr5B?l=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Fbriefing%2Fpromotion%2F%3Futm_source%3Dfacebook-organic%26utm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_campaign%3Dbriefing-elements

Il y a 2 mois
gh hj
gh hj

That black stuff is surely laughing... black stuff: "MUAHA!... All of these stars, planets, tiny things and beings ALL IN ME, ALL OF THEM! MUAHA... HA... HAAA! How great am I? I can't even go anywhere, I am everywhere! MUAHAHAAAaaaa. The star prays to me and the tiny being prays to the star... huhuhuhu... MUAHAHAHAAaaa!".

Il y a 2 mois
The Wise Wizard
The Wise Wizard

https://youtu.be/RmUhaw_QeB4

Il y a 2 mois
John Farris
John Farris

When I think of Entanglement I keep seeing hard and massless. Waves need time. Hard isn't real anyway even though it kinda is.

Il y a 2 mois
Corey Patterson
Corey Patterson

I’m very curious how Matt feels about the Janus Model. I know he mentioned it, but I wonder how far he dug into it. It’s hard to overstate how elegantly the notion of two conjugated manifolds ties dark energy/matter into a neat little bow to be explained. The math is perhaps not so elegant, but the explanation for why dark matter/energy behaves like it does is so exceedingly intuitive that everything else feels highly convoluted and improbable. After spending enough time with the JCM, using the concordance model feels like being a blind man groping in the dark.

Il y a 2 mois
Corey Patterson
Corey Patterson

(Continued pt 3) Think about two scenarios. In one a much greater mass of marbles is dropped on the sheet; in the other a far greater mass of balloons are released under the sheet. How do we imagine these joined systems interact? A bit of logical thinking and we can conclude that the accretion pattern of the dominant mass in any given area of the sheet will determine the pattern of curvature. That is to say, if there are more balloons we will see hills with valleys full of marbles; if there are more marbles, however, we will see pockets full of marbles depress into bowls formed by ridges of balloons. Current cosmological models insist there's more dark matter than regular matter. If visible matter takes the pattern of the former, we can assume there is more inverted mass in the area. If visible matter takes the pattern of the latter, we can assume there is more regular mass in the area. The standard model of the universe describe large galaxy clusters linked by hundred-lightyear long threads of galaxies surrounding massive empty voids. This can be pictured like bubbles from a pot full of dish soap. Planes of soap would be fairly rarified areas of matter, lines would be the galactic threads, and vertices of the bubbles would be galactic clusters. The ΛCDM model proposes "galactic filaments" which accrete around threads of dark matter. I will not emphasize problems with that, as I feel it is more productive to emphasize the very specific way this bimetric understanding of the manifold accords with reality (or at least our observations of reality). When we look at the universe on a grand scale, it seems to imply there is a greater distribution of inverted masses due to the filamentous shape. We see big voids full of “empty space” with apparent energy content, thus conclude dark matter. So on the universal scale the balloons of inverted mass matter are pushing regular matter marbles into “filaments” or valleys, but on the scale of our local group the marbles representing galaxies are held in rotation by the inverted matter surrounding them since there aren’t enough marbles to break past the balloons. My point in relation to THIS video (finally) is that if the Janus model is at all accurate, then it stands to reason that the “energy of the vacuum” could be the average energy density of all inverted mass as it slowly accretes in the massive voids between galaxies. That would explain why the expansion doesn’t happen in areas rich with positive-mass matter. Thus, if mass in the universe is somehow being inverted, perhaps in the center of a critical-mass neutron star (google “1916 Schwarzschild on the gravitational field of a sphere of incompressible fluid according to Einsteins theory”) we can assume that this inverted mass will simply increase the accretion rate of the voids, and therefore the expansion rate of the universe. Not sure I buy it, but it’s a hell of a better story than “mystery energy” and “matter we can’t find”.

Il y a 2 mois
Corey Patterson
Corey Patterson

(Continued pt 2) So if we want to consider it this way, we need two metrics g(+)µν and g(−)µν from which two different families of geodesics are calculated, referring to positive mass particles and negative mass particles, respectively. From these metrics, we calculate Ricci tensors R (+) µν and R (−) µν as well as Ricci scalars R(+) and R(−) . This crude 2-dimensional analogy is merely used to explain things, but it does helps illustrates what may be happening in our very own 4-dimensional universe. I prefer to refer to "negative mass" as "inverted mass" simply because, the way that this model requires you to look at it, negative mass is not an intrinsic feature of some "exotic matter", but instead stems from topological consequences; it is purely relative. The "bigravity" associated with inverted masses is an extension of general relativity describing the universe as a Riemannian manifold associated to two conjugated metrics generating their own geodesics, solutions of two coupled Einstein field equations. The second equation gives the metric and spatial curvature for the "negative sector" of the manifold. This is the equivalent to being on the balloon side of the sheet. Positive mass (marbles), viewed from the underside of the sheet, will produce a negative curvature and an anti-gravitational effect. The system of two coupled field equations involves a 4D hypersurface with two sides, each type of mass belonging to its own metric. What is important to note however, is that the two field equations are coupled, i.e. a mass always creates a positive curvature in space-time according to its own metric (where the mass appears visible), and it also always induces a negative curvature in the conjugate metric (where the mass appears invisible). To reiterate, "negative mass" is not an intrinsic feature of some exotic matter. It is nothing but the (anti)gravitational effect produced by any mass, when observed from the opposite sector. According to an observer measuring such mass in the same sector where it lays in, that mass always appears positive. This introduces the concept of apparent gravitational mass. Fundamentally, a mass is not "positive" or "negative"; it is both. Its sign depends on from "which side" we are measuring that mass. It is therefore a purely relative concept. Same thing for the "positive" and "negative" sectors: we call our sector the "positive" one simply because it is the one we live in, and we have to name both. But this is only a sign convention.

Il y a 2 mois
Corey Patterson
Corey Patterson

(Continued) Consider the classic rubber sheet example used in the perpetual motion episode of PBS Spacetime. The analogy is of space-time to a sheet, and when masses like bowling balls are introduced it warps to create curvature. A marble shot in a straight line past a bowling ball on this sheet would follow an apparently straight path on a curved plane, a geodesic. According to the most theories, negative (or inverted) masses follow the same geodesics as positive masses since there is only one metric tensor. However negative masses imply a negative curvature, which gives rise to an "anti-gravitational" effect. So the negative-mass-marbles slide along the sheet, but "pull" the sheet as they move. This poses obvious problems when they begin rolling towards a bowling ball. Because the sheet is continually pulled towards them, the warped state of space stays constant and the motion continues perpetually. This was addressed in both videos concerning negative masses, and is commonly known as the "runaway motion". This definitely violates the crackpot conjecture, so we need to find an explanation that works more reasonably. Let's change the situation slightly; think about how we might get the same anti-gravitational effect without invoking strange counter-intuitive "negative mass marbles". Perhaps we could use similarly sized spherical balloons filled with various lifting gasses to represent different negative masses of different densities? Immediately we can see the behavior is not so strange as long as the marbles and balloons are on opposite sides of the sheet. Then it becomes intuitive that the balloons, who want to ascend, will push away the marbles, who want to descend, as they both respectively warp the sheet. We can see that the balloons will aggregate as they all "fall" up towards the steepest hill, and marbles will aggregate as they fall into the deepest wells. And because they are on opposite sides of the sheet, they can roll right past each other as they attempt to find their spot. In essence, like attracts like and opposites repel. In order to get something that works like this, the marbles and balloons must be on opposite sides, meaning they're following different geodesics.

Il y a 2 mois
Corey Patterson
Corey Patterson

For the future readers too lazy to google, here’s a brief argument: The issue begins with the Poincare group. According to dynamical group theory, the action of elements of this group on movements in space-time result in some movements which follow a time reversal, they appear to be going "backwards through time". Modern physicists use the restricted Poincare group, limited to only orthocronous movements, and therefore ignore this issue. In group theory, however, the T operator is real and we can explore retrochronic movements. Smarter people than me (namely Jean-Marie Souriau) have shown, using maths I can only begin to understand, that using the full Poincare group, time reversal goes with mass and energy inversion. In quantum field theory, the T operator acting on Hilbert spaces is complex, and can be either linear and unitary, or anti-linear and anti-unitary; but is arbitrarily chosen anti-linear and anti-unitary in order to prevent inversion of energy, as the vacuum state of the Zero-point energy must have the lowest possible ground state and can not have negative values. But when this axiom was formulated, the accelerating expansion of the universe, which implies a negative pressure, was not known yet. As pressure is a volumetric energy density, it seems sensible to reconsider how we view negative energy states. So at least the idea of mass inversion is not entirely without precedent. There is at least some mathematical precedent for negative masses...

Il y a 2 mois
SrmthfgRockLee
SrmthfgRockLee

01:12 who else noticed the stars moving in backgruond

Il y a 2 mois
dddduuuuuhhhhhhhh
dddduuuuuhhhhhhhh

Could the red shift of an EM wave be reversed? Allowing us to see the original wave before the red shift. Then using filters like we do in space to get rid of noise, could we use this to better scan the universe for life? Maybe finding radio waves of a civilization in a far off galaxy?

Il y a 2 mois
Kranimal Hobbies
Kranimal Hobbies

I have a question that maybe you can answer. I have been watching your videos and something came to mind, now I haven't watched all of your vids, but none the less, I am gonna ask. It is about stars, or, to be more specific, about our sun. If our sun is constantly burning different gases and such, creating DNA changing radiation and burning different fuels, where is it getting all the particles, elements or whatever it is doing to keep going. It would have to run out at some point right? Relatively fast as well, considering it is getting all these elements from somewhere. Considering it has nothing but space around it, where is it getting the fuel to keep burning from?

Il y a 2 mois
Sid Kapoor
Sid Kapoor

Relatively fast is a few billion years on the comsological scale. And it is running out.

Il y a 2 mois
What if?
What if?

Here is a stupid question. Could dark energy be causality slowing down? Here is a video explaining what I mean and how the idea came to me; https://youtu.be/ggnHmyNb72Y

Il y a 2 mois
Scott deMoor
Scott deMoor

wow....... like..... wow...

Il y a 2 mois
Egli Zotaj
Egli Zotaj

Universe was an empty giant vacuum before big bang appeared... Dark matter is a negative energy... Electrons of dark matter resonate at frequency minus megahertz... That's why it can't be controlled... But as math says minus multiple minus gives plus... That's what may have caused big bang... dark matter.... The emptiness itself ... Its electrons are Resonating at minus... More the density of negative electrons increase than more it may provoke the production of a positive charged electron.. Minus x minus = plus.. And the presence of a positive charged electron has produced magnetic field and suddenly big bang.. Negative electrons of emptiness produce a positive electron... Just iv said minus x minus gives plus... And the presence of a positive electron creates electromagnetic field, creating a reaction of explosions....triggering other negative electrons to themselves... Forming new electrons... And the presence of positive electron in different density creates chemical production as hydrogen that was one of the elements in universe creation... Look the number of electrons of hydrogen in the chemical table...

Il y a 2 mois
Ashwin
Ashwin

Hmm just a thought. If space expands in all directions equally then shouldn't the amplitude of light also increase upwards as the wavelength increases sideways??

Il y a 2 mois
Jesus McBeth
Jesus McBeth

Also - dark energy changes randomly~ based on absorption rate of the black hole which is our universe on the outside of our universe

Il y a 2 mois
Jesus McBeth
Jesus McBeth

Episode on quantum up scattering?

Il y a 2 mois
Jesus McBeth
Jesus McBeth

#hotmess

Il y a 2 mois
Jesus McBeth
Jesus McBeth

Conclusively haha

Il y a 2 mois
William Granger
William Granger

Dark energy = spiral energy Beware the spiral nemesis

Il y a 2 mois
Sam Harper
Sam Harper

If it turns out that the cosmological constant isn't constant, wouldn't that mean we'd have to get another estimate of the age of the universe?

Il y a 2 mois
Sascha Uncia
Sascha Uncia

If the fastest speed possible is the speed of light, and objects like earth, the solar system, and the local cluster are moving through space at a set speed; does this mean that you could fire a laser from a reference point to sensors moving at the same relative speed positioned around the object, and light would reach the sensors at slightly different times? Or to rephrase, if you emit light from a fast moving cosmic object along both directions of it's vector, would the light emitted forward travel at a slower relative speed while the light fired backwards would seem like it's moving away faster than the speed of light? Could you use this for example, to determine the speed and direction of the solar system relative to spacetime? :3

Il y a 2 mois
Alling
Alling

Hey guys, I've got a (maybe stupid) question (probably). I have recently stumbled upon my school physics book and took a second look at all the stuff I used to find boring. What struck out at me was Newton's formular for calculating the gravitational force between to objects of mass m1 and m2. F=(G*m1*m2)/r^2. After having watched quite a few videos on this channel, especially on the properties of small particles and how they are sometimes considered as being point size I thought, maybe I could try and calculate the force between a proton and a neutron in the atom with Newton's formular. ((6.67408e-11) * (1.675e-27) *(1.672621898e-27)) / (1e-15)^2. After some digging I found that at 1 femtometer the force should be 2500N, which unfortnately the calculation above didn't yield. BUT if protons and neutrons where only points in size, one could calculate assume they can get infinitely close together, so I could calculate the distance at which they had to be to get the result of 2500N. So my question would be, is the distance between proton and neutron an inaccurate model (like the model of the atom and the electrons floating around it) or is the distance between protons and neutrons in the atom well established? And if so how big is it?

Il y a 2 mois
Brian Levine
Brian Levine

My kid must have a future in cosmology. He makes up crap all the time and because it fits his "model" assumes everyone should just accept it. 😁 In all seriousness, love this channel.

Il y a 2 mois
Michael Östman
Michael Östman

Brian Levine Sounds like a great kid.

Il y a 2 mois

Prochain

Dark Matter's Not Enough - with Andrew Pontzen

54:05

Dark Matter's Not Enough - with Andrew Pontzen

The Royal Institution

Vues 619 000

The Crisis in Cosmology

18:05

The Crisis in Cosmology

PBS Space Time

Vues 599 000

GAMING on The First 8K TV!!!!

13:44

GAMING on The First 8K TV!!!!

Linus Tech Tips

Vues 1 481 051

Why Machines That Bend Are Better

12:52

Why Machines That Bend Are Better

Veritasium

Vues 3 500 000

Do black holes contain dark matter?

13:18

How Will the Universe End? | Space Time

17:53

How Will the Universe End? | Space Time

PBS Space Time

Vues 1 000 000

In the Shadow of the Black Hole

17:34

In the Shadow of the Black Hole

European Southern Observatory (ESO)

Vues 817 000

When We First Made Tools

10:10

When We First Made Tools

PBS Eons

Vues 335 000

Disneyland Secrets Scavenger Hunt!!!

18:03

Attempting To Eat 30 Burgers at IN N OUT..

6:10

My Lipsticks

14:03

My Lipsticks

Jaclyn Hill

Vues 4 979 544

HAIR GEL vs VACUUM CHAMBER

11:13

HAIR GEL vs VACUUM CHAMBER

The King of Random

Vues 935 703

DOCTOR SLEEP - Official Teaser Trailer [HD]

2:41

DOCTOR SLEEP - Official Teaser Trailer [HD]

Warner Bros. Pictures

Vues 5 528 989

Kendall Is Pissed At Kourtney But Whose Side Does Khloé Take? | KUWTK | E!

2:41